FEDMA_LogoFinal-01FEDMA_LogoFinal-01FEDMA_LogoFinal-01FEDMA_LogoFinal-01
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Principles
    • National Association Members
    • Corporate Members
    • Governance & team
  • Latest News
  • Policy Area
    • Position Papers
    • Consumer Protection
    • Data Transfers
    • Digital Economy
    • Privacy & Data Protection
  • FASt
  • Projects
    • Ethical AI-Powered Marketing Charter
    • AI Policy
    • Education – PEEAC
    • Educational Hub
    • Sustainability Best Practices Guide
    • Legal Fact pack
    • Code of Practice for the Use of Personal Data
  • Contact
Subscribe
✕

ePrivacy: MEPs Adopt Extreme Report In LIBE Committee

25 October 2017

LIBE committee meeting about: Hearing on Schengen Border Management: state of play and further developments

On 19th October, the Civil Liberties justice and home affairs committee (LIBE committee) adopted the report of MEP Marju Lauristin for the review of the ePrivacy Regulation. The report was adopted by a short majority of 31 votes against 24 and one abstention. Additionally, the LIBE committee voted on a mandate to start the trialogue negotiations. The mandate is weak and a clear signal to the Council that not all of the European Parliament is behind the LIBE report.

The adopted report includes many provisions which could seriously impact the direct marketing industry, as well as the digital advertising and media industry. Most of these provisions are the results of amendments put forward by Socialists and Greens MEPs after the EPP decided not to support earlier compromised amendment, and illustrate the strong divisions that exist inside the European Parliament. However, this report is not yet the final position of the European Parliament. MEPs from the ECR and EPP groups have requested that the entire plenary of the European Parliament vote on the mandate for negotiations.

Looking in details into the provisions, the report is negative for direct marketing industry regarding number of various issues, including the definition of direct marketing, provisions on telemarketing, and strict rules for any call centres using automated connecting systems. Additionally, the report restricts quite severely the possibility for the advertising industry to provide data driven advertising and generate revenues for online publishers, through strict privacy settings.

While the provisions of the report are very unbalanced, its weak support in LIBE, and the coming vote in plenary demonstrate how MEPs are split on the issue and how many of them are calling for a more balanced approach to the ePrivacy Regulation. Unless the Parliament review its report and bring more balance into it, it is heading toward very difficult negotiations with the Council, which, while still reflecting on the text, has a much more open and flexible position.

Share

RECENT NEWS

  • GDPR record-keeping simplification: what difference will it really make?21 May 2025
  • Marketing, AI, and Ethics: BAM’s Perspective with Karine Ysebrant12 May 2025
  • FEDMA calls for a balanced and future-proof approach to pseudonymization in response to the EDPB’s consultation25 March 2025
  • Embedding Sustainability in Marketing: From Strategy to Impact19 March 2025

© Fedma 2024

Made with ❤️ by MFM Digital

Contact us

rue de la Loi, 155
BE-1040 Brussels, Belgium

+32 2 779 4268

info@fedma.org

Follow us

Support

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Intranet

Subscribe
Subscribe Become a member Intranet

Follow us

Support

Terms and conditionsPrivacy PolicyIntranet –

Become a member now

To discuss FEDMA Membership, please contact rdewouters@fedma.org or book an introductory call via Microsoft Bookings.

SEND EMAIL INTRODUCTORY CALL

Never see this message again.

DO NOT MISS OUR NEWS

Subscribe to our Newsletter